It has been three years since the Urban Affairs Coalition promised to hold the embezzlers accountable. Three years since they promised to make things right.
We, the taxpayers, have received nothing but more wasted taxpayer money.
We will be sharing emails that pull back the curtain on the history of egregious conduct by Littler Mendelson lawyer Malcolm Ingram.
Past communications from several lawsuits and negotiations handled by the “Littler Lunatic” from his past employers will speak for themselves.
Malcolm Ingram intentionally defrauded the court and defamed the programmer who is owed $217,000 from UAC.
UAC vendor employee cops a plea.
Meanwhile, UAC vendors The Hierarchy and Infinite Economic Development Solutions laugh all the way to the bank, while UAC sues the Caucasian informant for an amount tied to taxpayer money that, according to the admissions, was embezzled for reparations.
Who is being held accountable?
Mental Illness or Criminal Intent?
Malcolm Ingram makes shit up.
Malcolm Ingram’s strategy seems pretty simple:
Make the false accusations and then make the accused prove a negative.
Twist the narrative.
Throw some bullshit at the wall.
Wager the other person will eventually cave because they’re afraid of what it might cost them.
But that’s where the strategy can go spectacularly wrong.
Because what happens when the person on the receiving end has the receipts?
What happens when they’ve documented everything?
What happens when they stop caring about the cost to expose the truth?
What happens when they finally say:
“Fuck it. Let’s put EVERYTHING on the internet.”
Ask the other two attorneys, both disbarred for life, what happened when she documented their conduct that raised serious questions under the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct.
The Littler Lunatic
Is Malcolm Ingram truly delusional and really believes what he’s saying, or are his actions intentional?
Case(s) in point:
Malcolm Ingram told news reporters that the unpaid programmer fabricated >1,100 emails from UAC employees. What idiot would do that?
Fabricating evidence is a felony.
Malcolm Ingram accused opposing counsel of submitting evidence to court from a prior case against UAC opposing counsel handled.
That is a felony and would result in the attorney being disbarred.
Malcolm Ingram intentionally lied to the court claiming this website was published late in 2025.
Ingram knows that UAC management approved publication of this website on 10/16/2023.
Did Ingram lie to defraud their insurance company?
That is a criminal act.
Malcolm Ingram claimed that the embezzler (Jacques Latoison), and his partner in crime (Carlos Jones) offered to pay the Ohio LLC the taxpayer money and labor hours they had stolen for reparations, but only if she signed a non-disparagement agreement.
Yet there’s a glaring problem with that story:
If Malcolm Ingram is going to make a claim this specific, the obvious question is simple:
Where is the agreement, one email, one phone call regarding this?
Malcolm Ingram illegally obtained the programmer’s driver’s license from the embezzler, distributing to criminals, and publishing it to the public.
Malcolm Ingram illegally obtained the banking account information of the programmer’s family member, distributing it to criminals as well.
Malcolm Ingram falsely claimed that this website was published as a “retaliatory action” when the programmer did not pursue federal action on the right to sue UAC in 2025.
That is of course a lie, since it was published October 2023.
A bigger question is looming:
Why is UAC’s “fired” former HR director identifying as currently employed as UAC’s HR director working from NJ?
She is included in emails from the EEOC to UAC.
Malcolm Ingram boldface lied, stating the embezzler electronically deposited payments to the programmer’s personal banking account.
If Malcolm Ingram is going to make a claim this specific, the obvious question is simple:
Where are the embezzler’s transactions?
The programmer does not even have a banking account.
The embezzler never paid the programmer.
Where are the embezzler’s 1099’s – just one 1099 for anybody he claims to have employed since 2006?
What is Malcolm Ingram’s definition of “job abandonment”?
Being unable to work because you’re being eaten alive by bedbugs in a shithole homeless shelter?
Recovering from major surgery and unable to respond to emails?
Ask Francisco Cortez.
He was reportedly placed on a PIP just 30 days after his doctor cleared him to return to work.
If UAC was trying to avoid a discrimination claim, the timing, and the label “job abandonment”, deserve a very close look.
Child Molesters & Murderers on the UAC Payroll
UAC sues woman for defamation saying she falsely claimed UAC hires sex offenders and pedophiles and pays murderers when in fact they do.
Also, Malcolm Ingram justifying UAC hiring murders, child molesters, and rapists in 2020.
This is ODAAT employee Giovanni Pena, site manager at their Point Breeze facility.
UAC COLOURS volunteer:
UAC does not even report a child being groped at city hall to LE or Childline.
*** New information (from yet another wrongfully fired UAC employee) reveals that the child touched was a UAC summer intern. ***
A family member insider revealed that a schoolgirl reported a man had touched her and followed her at a UAC-supervised event at CITY HALL.
They had pictures of the creep.
Why did Urban Affairs Coalition not call LE?
Say her name: Skye.
It was not her fault!
UAC/Littler Lunatic Supports Sexual Assault
The female victim was fired.
The perpetrator was, of course, rehired by UAC.
Hats off the Malcolm Ingram for his handling of this case.
Our taxpayer dollars at work!
UAC hired the man back into a program where he is exposed to vulnerable females.
Pornography Sent to Children, Dogs Missing & Murdered
UAC/Littler Lunatic defames activist who reported an unregistered nonprofit for disabled children was sending pornography to children via text messages and sending thousands of harassing messages to the disabled children’s parents.
The nonprofit was buying service dogs for disabled children that were disappearing after being placed with the family of a volunteer.
The community was shocked when they learned one of the dogs was tortured on live video feed, forcing the disabled children to watch it die.
This crazy bitch, besties with the now “early retirement police force involved”, filed hundreds of false harassment charges since 2015 against innocent citizens.
UAC Workplace Investigations
When UAC employees report discrimination, they are defamed.
People “paid off” and fired on the Nutalie case UAC “turned on” kept the emails.
Correspondence provides documentary evidence that Malcolm Ingram advised UAC HR personnel to conduct a search of applicant’s public criminal court records before extending a conditional offer of employment, and that UAC’s HR Business Partner immediately indicated she would conduct that search. This conduct appears to implicate Philadelphia’s prohibition on pre-offer criminal-record inquiries/investigations.
Malcolm Ingram’s rationale is striking:
“Because an argument could be made that doing this is running a background check.”
That appears to recognize the legal issue while treating the search as something UAC should nevertheless do before the conditional offer.
Philadelphia’s current Fair Criminal Records Screening Standards Ordinance generally permits an employer to conduct a criminal-background check only after making a conditional offer of employment. The City specifically says employers may run the criminal background check only after the conditional offer.
Suicidal Employees – Good Luck
UAC HR and Malcolm Ingram have no idea how to spell HIPAA, nor what defines a HIPAA violation.
Does Malcolm Ingram want to talk about the UAC employees who needed help and experienced being left alone?
Hope these people have PTO left. JS
Eagles Game Tickets = Award?
Active paid attorney-client relationship
↓
Attorney provides personal entertainment to UAC leadership
(tickets to an Eagles football game)
↓
Two days later UAC tells attorney he has been selected for an award
↓
Attorney accepts the award
Malcolm Ingram is such a loser that the only way he gets accolades as “UAC’s Friend of the Year” award is if the Board he sits on gives it to him.
This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Over the past three years, people have been coming forward.
Sample UAC Separation Agreement
