This is the first time we have had to build a database of attorney misconduct to submit for review to governing authorities.
Great job, Littler, when you are asking the court to endorse your defamation lies.
On a past complaint, we were told if an attorney does not know his client is lying to the court, then it is not misconduct.
Malcolm Ingram knows his client is lying.
Malcolm Ingram intentionally defrauded the court and defamed the programmer who is owed $217,000 from UAC.
Who Must Report
Under the Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law (Cons. Stat. Tit. 23, § 6311), attorneys affiliated with an agency, institution, organization, school, or regularly established religious organization that is responsible for the care, supervision, guidance, or control of children are required to report Child Welfare Information Gateway+1. This includes:
- Attorneys working for or affiliated with schools
- Attorneys affiliated with religious organizations that supervise children
- Attorneys working for or with agencies that care for children (e.g., foster care, juvenile justice, child welfare)
Two Philadelphia Pastors (COPS?)
Accused of Sexually Exploiting Minors
It has been three years since the Urban Affairs Coalition promised to hold the embezzlers accountable. Three years since they promised to make things right.
We, the taxpayers, have received nothing but more wasted taxpayer money.
We will be sharing emails that pull back the curtain on the history of egregious conduct by Littler Mendelson lawyer Malcolm Ingram.
Past communications from several lawsuits and negotiations handled by the “Littler Lunatic” from his past employers will speak for themselves.
Malcolm Ingram Demonstrates the Streisand Effect
Communication with IRS Criminal Investigator:
Immunity for Persons Who Report Child Abuse and Neglect | Child Welfare Information Gateway
I am highly offended, too.
We know you did not want anyone else to know what is going on inside UAC. Everything posted is true.
Understanding the Streisand Effect: When Hiding Information Backfires
Is there a recurring practice of using Pennsylvania General Fund money to pursue litigation after responsible parties discussed, in emails, that the expenditures were disproportionate to the expected benefit?
We contend that there is. We have identified prior cases in which decision-makers discussed and acknowledged excessive litigation expenditures, yet the spending continued.
The question is therefore not simply how much was spent, but who authorized the spending, what they knew about its cost, what governmental objective justified continuing it, and whether Pennsylvania taxpayers were required to bear litigation expenses that had become disproportionate to any reasonably anticipated benefit.
Did Malcolm Ingram have a duty to warn?
If he did not warn, did he benefit financially?
Pennsylvania’s disciplinary system allows any person alleging attorney misconduct to file a complaint with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), and complaints should state the factual basis for the allegations. Pennsylvania Rule 8.4 also expressly identifies dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice as professional misconduct.
Littler retained E. N. to conduct service and/or provide evidence despite information establishing that E.N. had previously been terminated from law-enforcement employment for making false statements under oath.
Board of Directors
Reparations Are Us
Where the hell is the accountability?
When C-suite executives and management approved invoices and custom software, knowing it was being stolen, tied to a program to ensure Black-owned and women-owned businesses receive their fair share of contracting opportunities?
Executive oversight isn’t optional when taxpayers are footing the bill.
The rules governing cases filed in state court in Pennsylvania require that the person who verifies a pleading must certify (Rule 1023.1) the truth of the allegations.
If given written notice that some or all of the allegations are false (without question) then the party filling suit may be liable for sanctions (Rule 1023.2) and the defendant’s attorney fees if the suit is not corrected or withdrawn.
Senator Sharif Street Confirms
The Welcoming Committee
There is no expiration date on accountability, integrity, and ethics.
The senator’s website lists his accolades dating back to before the birth of Christ.
Boys & Girls Clubs of Philadelphia
This is how it happens.
A trusted member of the community is trusted to protect our children.
Did you know child safety clearances are only required to be from a recent FIVE-YEAR report.
A molester could theoretically submit one five years old and be grandfathered in.
When ODAAT submitted an ESC in March of 2020 to give Pena a raise, it triggered a background check.
To Malcolm Ingram, is the Deductible the Incentive?
Malcolm Ingram knows the insurance structure. He knows the deductible.
He knows how much UAC is responsible for before the insurer begins paying.
That raises a much bigger question:
Does the deductible create an incentive to keep billing until that threshold is reached?
A concerned contemporary has provided emails and an example from a UAC EEOC case handled by Ingram. The legal bills for a single case are astounding.
Even more concerning is the apparent pattern of UAC promptly approving and releasing payments to Ingram’s firm when the outstanding balance falls within the deductible.
If the deductible effectively becomes the target, that deserves investigation.
Someone should compare Ingram’s invoices across UAC’s cases against the applicable insurance deductibles and ask:
How often do the bills come remarkably close to-or reach-the deductible?
Because if the deductible consistently corresponds with the amount billed, the question is no longer simply how expensive was the litigation?
It becomes:
Was the insurance deductible functioning as an incentive to keep the meter running?
| Here are some of them… (still building the list) |
| Damon Humes v. Urban Affairs Coalition |
| Tyeisha Fletcher v. Urban Affairs Coalition |
| Rasheed Marshall v. Urban Affairs Coalition |
| Rashidah Elahi v. Urban Affairs Coalition |
| El Hadj Moulouad v. Natalie Knochenhauer & Urban Affairs Coalition |
| Angelic Bradley v. Urban Affairs Coalition |
PHMC – The Caucasian Outfit the Embezzler Hated
Is this a trade secret, too? I took notes from a post-meeting with Jacques Latoison when he listed several Caucasians he and his “associates” were targeting to “take down” for being white. At that time, I took fast notes and had no idea what PHMC stood for, nor did I know how to spell “Caucasian”. PHMC stands for Public Health Management Corporation. And Latoison hated Mike Hinson for doing business with #CaucasianRic. (Provident) Latoison was big time mad over PFV “going white”.
The timestamp is 10/20/2022 2:13 PM.
PHMC stands for Public Health Management Corporation. And Latoison hated Mike Hinson for doing business with #CaucasianRic. Latoison was big time mad over PFV “going white”. The timestamp is 10/20/2022 2:13 PM.
UAC vendor employee cops a plea.
Meanwhile, UAC vendors The Hierarchy and Infinite Economic Development Solutions laugh all the way to the bank, while UAC sues the Caucasian informant for an amount tied to taxpayer money that, according to the admissions, was embezzled for reparations.
Who is being held accountable?
Mental Illness or Criminal Intent?
Malcolm Ingram makes shit up.
Malcolm Ingram’s strategy seems pretty simple:
Make the false accusations and then make the accused prove a negative.
Twist the narrative.
Throw some bullshit at the wall.
Wager the other person will eventually cave because they’re afraid of what it might cost them.
But that’s where the strategy can go spectacularly wrong.
Because what happens when the person on the receiving end has the receipts?
What happens when they’ve documented everything?
What happens when they stop caring about the cost to expose the truth?
What happens when they finally say:
“Fuck it. Let’s put EVERYTHING on the internet.”
Ask the other two attorneys, both disbarred for life, what happened when she documented their conduct that raised serious questions under the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct.
The Littler Lunatic
UAC filed a $200,000 “defamation” claim against a retired Ohio worker despite documented admissions that a vendor and UAC executives were involved in the $217,000 heist.
Now the Littler Lunatic is asking her to pay his legal fees.
From what income? Social Security?
Is Malcolm Ingram truly delusional and really believes what he’s saying, or are his actions intentional?
Malcolm Ingram told news reporters that the unpaid programmer fabricated >1,100 emails from UAC employees.
What idiot would do that?
Fabricating evidence is a felony.
Malcolm Ingram stated that UAC never told the programmer to download databases.
SMDH
I have over 225 UAC emails, including from Sir Kevin, instructing me to do just that.
Now, I have another entire email thread where Carlos Jones instructed me to do just that because he had hired two employees who could not work because Jacques refused to give them computers or access to the SQL BE.
George Norcross sues Nancy Phillips & the Inquirer for $100 million
I have fabricated NOTHING.
Malcolm Ingram accused opposing counsel of submitting evidence to court from a prior case against UAC opposing counsel handled.
That is a felony and would result in the attorney being disbarred.
Knowing Misrepresentation of a Material Fact to the Court
Malcolm Ingram intentionally lied to the court claiming this website was published late in 2025.
Ingram knows that UAC management approved publication of this website on 10/16/2023.
In fact, UAC management knew the website was created in September 2023.
There is evidence suggesting that the late-2025 publication date was not merely an error but was selected to create both an apparent one-year defamation limitations-period advantage and an insurance-coverage advantage.
Here is proof a board member’s law firm was looking at the website 11/9/2023.
I highly doubt that Mr. Rodgers lied to me.
(He exclaimed, “oh no, not again.”)
James J. Rodgers – Dilworth Paxson LLP
Does Arun Prabhakaran have amnesia?
Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 prohibits a lawyer from knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a tribunal and requires corrective measures if the lawyer later learns a material statement was false.
Presumably, Malcom Ingram has not told the court that Hiscox is suing UAC, presumably to recover the money they paid under false statements.
Not sure but seems like it to a reasonable person.
Jackson Lewis Knew
Before Malcolm Ingram was the #LittlerLunatic, he was the #JacksonJerk.
But of course, he is personal friends with the embezzler.
At this time, I only knew that if I did not comply, some attorney whose name began with an “M*” would destroy me.
UAC Board Member Knew
Proof the Board member knew the website was operational 11/9/2023.
I wonder what jackass attorney, who is friends with Latoison, handled this outrageous fake PPE swindle.
Malcolm Ingram is coincidentally obsessed with claiming that I fabricated evidence.
Who the hell fabricates an entire fleet of trucks, news station, and a magic Covid-19 potion?
James Rodgers Email Trail
A Remarkable Claim – and No Documentary Evidence
Malcolm Ingram claimed that the embezzler (Jacques Latoison), and his partner in crime (Carlos Jones) offered to pay the Ohio LLC the taxpayer money and labor hours they had stolen for reparations, but only if she signed a non-disparagement agreement.
Yet there’s a glaring problem with that story:
If Malcolm Ingram is going to make a claim this specific, the obvious question is simple:
Where is the agreement, one email, one phone call regarding this?
Threats of Physical Violence
Malcolm Ingram is well aware that the programmer is the target of a death threat for her reporting a deranged nonprofit director (for disabled children) sending pornography to children and her bestie murdering dogs, forcing autistic children to watch as the dogs die.
Her two longtime friends of twenty years, both advocates for abused children who were helping her investigate the case, were mysteriously run off the road and killed.
In addition, the embezzler has repeatedly threatened to send his people “after her and her family.”
Malcolm Ingram, threatened to take “aggressive action” against the victim who reported the embezzlement.
Goons with guns have now trespassed onto her husband’s private property seventeen times, peering into his home, breaking doors, taking illegal photos, and interrogating neighbors.
Ingram is also aware that the programmer was forced to relocate in late 2025 because of safety concerns. These circumstances make any threat of “aggressive action” particularly serious given the documented history of threats, felony trespassing, and the need to relocate for safety.
Even more seriously, the criminal activity exposed through an earlier website decades ago was connected to events in which two of the programmer’s friends were murdered execution-style. That history provides important context for evaluating both the programmer’s credibility and the seriousness of threats directed toward her and her family in the present UAC matter.
UAC executives ignore threats of violence that most would report to LE.
Malcolm Ingram illegally obtained the programmer’s driver’s license from the embezzler, distributing to criminals, and publishing it to the public.
While the ABA Model Rules make this disclosure optional, a number of states have adopted mandatory versions of this rule, requiring lawyers to disclose when they know of a threat that could result in death or serious bodily harm.
Malcolm Ingram illegally obtained the banking account information of the programmer’s family member, distributing it to criminals as well.
Malcolm Ingram defrauded the court, stating that the programmer has a cell phone, when she has not had a cell phone since 2022.
Malcolm Ingram contacts people UAC is suing directly behind the court’s back.
Malcolm Ingram falsely claimed that this website was published as a “retaliatory action” when the programmer did not pursue federal action on the right to sue UAC in 2025.
That is of course a lie, since it was published October 2023.
A bigger question is looming:
Why is UAC’s “fired” former HR director identifying as currently employed as UAC’s HR director working from NJ?
She is included in emails from the EEOC to UAC.
Why is UAC using SHIGG1984@aol.com to communicate with the prior HR Director?
Maybe her son with two FT jobs might know.
Malcolm Ingram boldface lied, stating the embezzler electronically deposited payments to the programmer’s personal banking account.
If Malcolm Ingram is going to make a claim this specific, the obvious question is simple:
Where are the embezzler’s transactions?
The programmer does not even have a banking account.
The embezzler never paid the programmer.
Where are the embezzler’s 1099’s – just one 1099 for anybody he claims to have employed since 2006?
What is Malcolm Ingram’s definition of “job abandonment”?
Being unable to work because you’re being eaten alive by bedbugs in a shithole homeless shelter?
Recovering from major surgery and unable to respond to emails?
Ask Francisco Cortez. email: fj.zavala.cortes@gmail.com
He was reportedly placed on a PIP just 30 days after his doctor cleared him to return to work.
If UAC was trying to avoid a discrimination claim, the timing, and the label “job abandonment”, deserve a very close look.
Malcolm Ingram Retaliates Against EEOC Complainants
and Their Relatives???
What the hell is this?
These people aren’t even blood relatives.
How is this tolerated?
Failure to Report Embezzlement to LE
From what we can reasonably understand, Malcolm Ingram appears to be arguing that there is no specific “embezzlement” statute in the Pennsylvania Crimes Code. But that distinction seems more semantic than substantive: Pennsylvania’s Crimes Code expressly provides for multiple forms of theft, including theft by unlawful taking or disposition under 18 Pa.C.S. § 3921 and theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received under § 3927.
Which raises an even more fundamental question about the defamation lawsuit:
Is the alleged “defamation” really about the programmer reporting conduct that she believed constituted theft or financial misconduct and should have been reported to the appropriate authorities?
If UAC executives’ position is that protecting or safeguarding taxpayer-funded money was not their responsibility, then the public deserves to know exactly what responsibility they believed they had when confronted with allegations of financial misconduct involving those funds.
Allegations UAC C-Suite confirmed, in writing, and by providing financials.
DA: Former Visit Philly Exec Embezzled $200K – Philadelphia Magazine
Has Malcolm Ingram advised UAC to report the money and time Latoison and Carlos Jones swindled to LE?
When is it going to be UAC’s turn?
District of Columbia | Arrest Warrants Issued for Six Current and Former MPD Members of the Fifth District for Overtime Fraud | United States Department of Justice
The Hierarchy Timesheets
UAC is paying a vendor with tax money who is allergic to paying his own taxes!
Let’s see what the grant managers have to say.
A good faith estimate is that “The Hierarchy” has billed $81,155 for hours nobody worked.
While Latoison is rocking 11 federal tax liens, reportedly coughing up $1400 on an alleged $300,000 unpaid taxes bill.
Stealing 100% of OT while telling the grants it was paid to a worker, inflating hours.
Good luck with the feds filing a DTSA claim when the programmer has not been paid.
The feds have this information, so DTSA them.
One example:
This is five minutes of work.
Press a button, print, email.
Has Malcolm Ingram’s friend, as Jacques Latoison describes him, informed the court?
The Hierarchy’s profit on my work is mild.
Back in 2017-2018 Latoison abused eight people, paying them between $17.50 and $19.00, and he billed $60.00.
He made a 255% profit.
see: Timecard Fraud
Another example:
$12,700 profit, to cut one worker’s two paychecks.
UAC Embezzlement Not Reported to LE?
Did UAC strike a “secret agreement” with UAC employee Lisa Dozier to repay the money she stole using the UAC corporate credit card? Was the money negotiated in that agreement ever repaid? Did UAC report the crime to LE?
Who would believe a disgruntled employee kept the receipts from a decade ago,
saw this website, and dropped the evidence?
The UAC Payroll Administrator/HRIS Specialist “accidentally overpaid” an employee by $10,501.91 in a lump-sum payment in 2018.
The recipient reportedly praised Jesus and said he gambled the entire amount away.
How does a payroll error of $10,501.91 supposedly go undetected for two months?
Carlos Jones Double-Dipping
Malcolm Ingram continues to defraud the court and the taxpayers in denying that Carlos Jones was a City of Philadelphia employee AND a UAC vendor (Infinite Economic Development Solutions) beginning 2015.
Does Ingram really think the programmer does not have proof?
The city confirmed Carlos Jones above retired in 2023.
Carlos Jones signed UAC documents as an EDP employee while simultaneously appearing in City records as a City employee, and the City later confirmed that the Carlos Jones in its records retired in 2023 at the expected retirement age.
Littler itself markets its lawyers as highly experienced employment attorneys and describes the firm as exclusively representing management. Chambers’ current profile also describes Littler as a highly regarded labor-and-employment practice and specifically praises its lawyers’ ability to logically evaluate issues and provide nuanced solutions.
Jesus Christ.
UAC Employees Fired without Pay
Again. Malcolm Ingram is bold face lying, denying that some UAC employees were fired without pay and their benefits withheld to financially strangle them to do as UAC demanded.
Oh boy, bring it on.
Malcolm Ingram Approves Invalid NDA
Good news, embezzlers.
You, too, can copy an NDA from the internet written in the 1900s and present it as valid.
This freaking NDA was never signed by Latoison because he could not pay a white person. He never paid the programmer.
The Hierarchy paid the OH LLC because UAC would only pay a Black person.
The venue is Chester County.
UAC never paid the white lady or the Black man anything.
How in the hell did Ingram get the court to say this is a valid NDA with UAC to be heard in agony county?
Did he ever actually attach it?
The court is being told the programmer was married to the Black LLC owner when this was signed.
Littler knows she was married to another man at the time of signing.
Rule 8.4(c) separately prohibits conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
Did Ingram knowingly misrepresent to the tribunal the identity of the parties, the execution status, or the terms of a document that he relied upon against the programmer?
1. The Hierarchy’s name appears as the Company.
2. The Contractor’s identity is blank.
3. There are no contract from-to dates.
4. The Hierarchy’s authorized-representative signature is blank.
5. The programmer personally received $0.
6. The payment records show The Hierarchy paid an OH LLC.
7. No 1099 was issued to the OH LLC nor the programmer.
8. UAC nevertheless uses this document against the programmer.
9. Ingram testified that the parties had an NDA and that this was the agreement.
10. Ingram characterized the venue as permitting UAC to sue anywhere in Pennsylvania, while the document expressly says Chester County.
Malcolm Ingram is the HOA President of Social Media
Please donate if you are able to Farrah Samuels who was fired from UAC and her social media was then monitored by UAC executives.
Fundraiser by Farrah Samuels : Farrah’s Fight to Survive & Thrive
You do not own the internet!
Shame on Malcolm Ingram and UAC Executives
Shame on Malcolm Ingram for putting allegations before the court that the evidence can contradict, and for attacking the programmer who dared to document what she found.
How dare anyone put institutional reputation ahead of the safety of our children.
There is a new generation watching.
A generation that expects nonprofits to demonstrate integrity, accountability, transparency, and genuine service to the community; not secrecy, intimidation, or expensive legal battles aimed at making uncomfortable information disappear.
When UAC executives send their legal team into court to try to stop information from spreading, they may believe they are protecting the organization’s reputation.
They’re not.
You didn’t bury the story.
You advertised it.
UAC and Mel Wells knew since March 2020, six years, they had a tier 3 sex offender on board.
There is a REAL ISSUE when critical problems are only discussed “face-to-face” and “personal emails.”
Taxpayers deserve to know what is happening.
Public records independently establish that Street had an ongoing relationship with ODAAT during this period. His office reported a $1 million RACP award for ODAAT’s AFCOM renovation, describing it as recovery-facility improvements. His office also later described Senator Street visiting ODAAT with a state cabinet official to discuss its services and funding needs.
Sharif claims he did not know.
Malcolm Ingram should have known.
Did ODAAT Receive Grant $$ Used for YRM?
Community Drug Abuse Prevention Grant Program – PA Office of Attorney General
grants@attorneygeneral.gov
aluker@attorneygeneral.gov
Anthony W. Luker
Office of Attorney General Josh Shapiro
PH: 215.384.6633
Shopping with Your ODAAT
Community Child Molester Hero Day
Child Molesters & Murderers on the UAC Payroll
UAC sues woman for defamation saying she falsely claimed UAC hires sex offenders and pedophiles and pays murderers when in fact they do.
Also, Malcolm Ingram justifying UAC hiring murders, child molesters, and rapists in 2020.
This is ODAAT employee Giovanni Pena, site manager at their Point Breeze facility.
UAC COLOURS volunteer:
UAC does not even report a child being groped at city hall to LE or Childline.
*** New information (from yet another wrongfully fired UAC employee) reveals that the child touched was a UAC summer intern. ***
A family member insider revealed that a schoolgirl reported a man had touched her and followed her at a UAC-supervised event at CITY HALL.
They had pictures of the creep.
Why did Urban Affairs Coalition not call LE?
Say her name: Skye.
It was not her fault!
UAC/Littler Lunatic Supports Sexual Assault
The female victim was fired.
The perpetrator was, of course, rehired by UAC.
Hats off the Malcolm Ingram for his handling of this case.
Our taxpayer dollars at work!
UAC hired the man back into a program where he is exposed to vulnerable females.
Malcolm Ingram’s workaround for employees fired for outrageous acts is to have George Mosse hire them as “consultants.”
Kenneth Parker was fired for beating the crap out of a UAC/ODAAT shelter client.
He was quickly rehired as a “consultant” over in PAAN.
Littler Lunatic Handled the Severed Baby Finger Case
see: Severed Baby Finger
Was Malcolm Ingram honest and forthcoming in his handling of this case?
Infant girl loses part of her finger in unexplained daycare incident: Lawsuit – Crime Online
Were the parents told that their baby was left alone with a UAC 14-year-old intern?
Pornography Sent to Children, Dogs Missing & Murdered
UAC/Littler Lunatic defames activist who reported an unregistered nonprofit for disabled children was sending pornography to children via text messages and sending thousands of harassing messages to the disabled children’s parents.
The nonprofit was buying service dogs for disabled children that were disappearing after being placed with the family of a volunteer.
Her two longtime friends of twenty years, both advocates for abused children who were helping her investigate the case, were mysteriously run off the road and killed.
The community was shocked when they learned one of the dogs was tortured on live video feed, forcing the disabled children to watch it die.
This crazy bitch, besties with the now “early retirement police force involved”, filed hundreds of false harassment charges since 2015 against innocent citizens.
Failure to Perform Reasonable Due Diligence
Malcolm Ingram failed to read the court docket detailing that the programmer had a prior shithead IT contractor who erased her hours, as a news station at her home, by dumb luck, recorded on camera, the timesheets be modified, and stole her pay when she uncovered and reported criminal activity.
It was her website, similar to this website, that resulted in these charges.
It took three long years for the truth to come out.
See news story: PWSA Criminal Charges
The fact that it reportedly took three years for the underlying truth to emerge makes the failure to investigate even more significant.
An attorney conducting reasonable due diligence should not simply accept a narrative about a programmer or the creation of a website without examining readily available court records concerning that person’s prior experience with executive misconduct, altered time records, wage theft, and reporting criminal activity.
Even more seriously, the criminal activity exposed through an earlier website decades ago was connected to events in which two of the programmer’s friends were murdered execution-style.
That history provides important context for evaluating both the programmer’s credibility and the seriousness of threats directed toward her and her family in the present UAC matter.
🍆The Case of the Helicopter Penis 🍆 at the Convent⛪🧕🏼
Malcolm Ingram failed to do even minimal due diligence.
A basic inquiry would have established that the programmer is a contract programmer for three United Ways, performing workplace-campaign work and verifying that designated charities are properly registered and in compliance.
When it is discovered that a nonprofit is not registered, a report is made to the appropriate state charity board.
Some mentally ill nonprofit directors become unhinged, go 🦇💩 batshit crazy and retaliate when their grift is up.
In this case, the underlying investigation involved an allegation that an unregistered nonprofit director broke into a convent and exposed himself to nuns.
That is precisely why basic due diligence matters. If the underlying statement is true and can be supported by evidence, calling it “defamation” does not make it false.
Ingram could have investigated the programmer’s professional role, the charity-registration process, the underlying records, and the factual basis for the statements before pursuing litigation.
He apparently chose not to.
Steven Johnson Embezzlement Case
Any word on this embezzlement case from 3/2019?
Malcolm Ingram required all communication to go through him before the AG received the requested information from UAC.
People are looking into it.
UAC Workplace Investigations
When UAC employees report discrimination, they are defamed.
People “paid off” and fired on the Nutalie case UAC “turned on” kept the emails.
Correspondence provides documentary evidence that Malcolm Ingram advised UAC HR personnel to conduct a search of an applicant’s public criminal court records before extending a conditional offer of employment, and that UAC’s HR Business Partner immediately indicated she would conduct that search.
This conduct appears to implicate Philadelphia’s prohibition on pre-offer criminal-record inquiries/investigations.
Malcolm Ingram’s rationale is striking:
“Because an argument could be made that doing this is running a background check.”
That appears to recognize the legal issue while treating the search as something UAC should nevertheless do before the conditional offer.
This was Terrance Franklin, talented chef.
Philadelphia’s current Fair Criminal Records Screening Standards Ordinance generally permits an employer to conduct a criminal-background check only after making a conditional offer of employment.
The city specifically says employers may run the criminal background check only after the conditional offer.
Suicidal Employees – Good Luck
UAC HR and Malcolm Ingram have no idea how to spell HIPAA, nor what defines a HIPAA violation. Hope these people have PTO left and a doctor’s excuse.
Does Malcolm Ingram want to talk about the UAC employees who needed help and experienced being left alone?
One was sent home.
One of my best friends left work, telling management he no longer wanted to live and was prepared to end his life. Just two weeks after his wedding.
He went to his parents’ house, parked in their garage, started his car, and did as he warned.
Eagles Game Tickets = Award?
Active paid attorney-client relationship
↓
Attorney provides personal entertainment to UAC leadership
(tickets to an Eagles football game)
↓
Two days later UAC tells attorney he has been selected for an award
↓
Attorney accepts the award
Malcolm Ingram is such a loser that the only way he gets accolades as “UAC’s Friend of the Year” award is if the Board he sits on gives it to him.
This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Over the past three years, people have been coming forward.
Sample UAC Separation Agreement
Who else?
